Friday, April 27, 2012

CARTOONS - The RIP-LCMV Model for Type 1 Diabetes


Attached is some really neat info on RIP-LCMV mice.  RIP-LCMV Mouse Model


 The RIP-LCMV mouse model was created to break tolerance to a defined target autoantigen expressed by b-cells through a viral infection. Such a target antigen represents a component of ‘self’ and therefore the host is ignorant or tolerant to that antigen.

Initiation of autoimmunity by virus-infection is twofold: First, the infection causes an activation of the innate immune system resulting in an inflammatory response involving the release of chemokines and cytokines. Those inflammatory factors in turn attract and activate leukocytes to the site of infection in a non-specific manner. Second, the presence of an identical antigen on both the b-cells and the infecting virus focuses this non-specific innate immune response specifically on the target antigen and thus breaks self-tolerance. Hence, after elimination of the intruding virus, the awakened immune response concentrates on the remaining transgenic target antigen expressed by the b-cells resulting in T1D. This scenario was experimentally reconstructed in the labs of Michael Oldstone (Scripps, La Jolla, CA) (Oldstone et al. (1991) Cell 65: 319-331) and Rolf Zinkernagel (Zurich, Switzerland) (Ohashi et al (1991) Cell 65: 305-317) in the early 1990’s.

By using the rat insulin promoter (RIP) they created transgenic mice whose pancreatic b-cells expressed either the nucleoprotein (NP) or the glycoprotein (GP) of LCMV as defined target antigens. Expression of either target antigen per se does not lead to b-cell dysfunction, islet cell infiltration, hyperglycemia, or spontaneous activation of autoreactive lymphocytes. However, infection with LCMV results in T1D in >95% of RIP-LCMV mice.  




Just as proposed for human T1D, the onset of diabetes in RIP-LCMV mice depends on the action of both, autoreactive CD4 and CD8 T-cells and correlates with the numbers of auto-aggressive lymphocytes generated. In accordance, the incidence of disease varied between the individual transgenic lines ranging from 2 weeks (RIP-GP lines) to 1-6 months (RIP-NP lines). Further studies revealed the mechanism involved in the rapid compared to the slow onset diabetes: Transgenic lines expressing the LCMV-GP transgene exclusively in the b-cells of the islets manifested rapid-onset T1D (10-14 days after viral challenge). In these lines the high systemic numbers of auto-aggressive CD8 T-cells were sufficient to induce diabetes and did not require help from CD4 cells. In contrast, in lines expressing the LCMV-NP transgene in both the b-cells and in the thymus, T1D took longer to occur after subsequent LCMV challenge. Several lines of evidence indicated that in RIP-NP mice the anti-self (viral) CTL were of lower affinity and that CD4 T-cells were essential to generate anti-self (viral) CD8 lymphocyte-mediated T1D. In addition, mouse models in which transgene-encoded ‘target-antigens’ are expressed in the pancreatic b-cells, such as the RIP-LCMV and the INS-HA mouse, have demonstrated that the presence of autoaggressive T-cells alone is not enough to cause disease. Unspecific ‘bystander factors’, such as cytokines and chemokines generated during the acute inflammation after LCMV infection, are important to drive the autoaggressive response (b-cell destruction) in ‘antigen-specific’ models for T1D.


















Figure 2: Fast vs. slow onset model for type 1 diabetes
LCMV-GP is not expressed in the thymus of RIP-LCMV-GP mice and thus, LCMV-GP-specific CD8 T-cells of high affinity are released into the periphery resulting in fast destruction of LCMV-GP expressing beta-cells upon LCMV-infection and subsequently a fast-onset diabetes. In contrast, expression of LCMV-NP within the thymus of RIP-LCMV-NP mice induces the deletion of autoaggressive CD8 T-cells with high affinity. Only LCMV-NP-specific CD8 T-cells of low- or medium affinity are released into the periphery. Therefore the destrcution process of the insulin-producing beta-cell is delayed and depends on CD4 T-cell help resulting in a slow-onset type of diabetes.

COOL CARTOON









Figure 3: Immunopathogenic events following LCMV-infection in the RIP-LCMV model
LCMV-infection of the pancreas causes the release of ‘pro-inflammatory’ cytokines, such as TNFa, by resident macrophages. In turn, chemokines are released by activated endothelial cells as well as b-cells. Among them CXCL10 is the earliest chemokine to be expressed leading to high local concentrations at a very early time after LCMV-infection. CXCL10 predominantly attracts activated T-cells of the more aggressive Th-1 phenotype, which migrate into the inflamed tissue. Infiltrating LCMV-specific T-cells start destroying some b-cells in a perforin dependent manner. At a later stage further presentation of LCMV- and other islet antigens by professional antigen presenting cells, such as dendritic cells (DCs) leads to further proliferation and expansion of the autoaggressive T-cell repertoire. Islet antigen-specific, aggressive T-cells together with unspecific bystander factors destroy most of the remaining b-cells resulting in overt diabetes.








CLONING ASSIGNMENT

This is my next posting in my FECHing series.  Today's assignemnt is cloning the FECH protein from its gene.  The NCBI data base was used to look up the protein sequence within the gene.  They are highlighted in red.
FECH ferrochelatase [ Homo sapiens ]
NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_001012515.2

Primer Blast was used to pick some primers.  I had to narrow the search for the forward primers from 40 to 80 and from 1410 to 1480 on the reverse.
The primers provided by the Primer Blast program were:
Forward primer  1   CCACTGCTGGGCGGACACCT  20
Template          47  ......................................................  66

Reverse primer      1     TTGCCTAACGCCACGGGGTC  20
Template        1439  ........................................................  1420

They are highlighted in yellow.

1
aggtcagggg
gctggggacg
cgcgtgggga
tcgctacccg
gctcggccac
tgctgggcgg
61
acacctgggc
gcgccgccgc
gggaggagcc
cggactcggg
ccgaggctgc
ccaggcaatg
121
cgttcactcg
gcgcaaacat
ggctgcggcc
ctgcgcgccg
cgggcgtcct
gctccgcgat
181
ccgctggcat
ccagcagctg
gagggtctgt
cagccatgga
ggtggaagtc
aggtgcagct
241
gcagcggccg
tcaccacaga
aacagcccag
catgcccagg
gtgcaaaacc
tcaagttcaa
301
ccgcagaaga
ggtatgagtc
taacatcagg
aagccgaaaa
ctggaatatt
aatgctaaac
361
atgggaggcc
ctgaaactct
tggagatgtt
cacgacttcc
ttctgagact
cttcttggac
421
cgagacctca
tgacacttcc
tattcagaat
aagctggcac
cattcatcgc
caaacgccga
481
acccccaaga
ttcaagagca
gtaccgcagg
attggaggcg
gatcccccat
caagatatgg
541
acttccaagc
agggagaggg
catggtgaag
ctgctggatg
aattgtcccc
caacacagcc
601
cctcacaaat
actatattgg
atttcggtac
gtccatcctt
taacagaaga
agcaattgaa
661
gagatggaga
gagatggcct
agaaagggct
attgctttca
cacagtatcc
acagtacagc
721
tgctccacca
caggcagcag
cttaaatgcc
atttacagat
actataatca
agtgggacgg
781
aagcccacga
tgaagtggag
cactattgac
aggtggccca
cacatcacct
cctcatccag
841
tgctttgcag
atcatattct
aaaggaactg
gaccattttc
cacttgagaa
gagaagcgag
901
gtggtcattc
tgttttctgc
tcactcactg
cccatgtctg
tggtcaacag
aggcgaccca
961
tatcctcagg
aggtaagcgc
cactgtccaa
aaagtcatgg
aaaggctgga
gtactgcaac
1021
ccctaccgac
tggtgtggca
atccaaggtt
ggtccaatgc
cctggttggg
tcctcaaaca
1081
gacgaatcta
tcaaagggct
ttgtgagagg
gggaggaaga
atatcctctt
ggttccgata
1141
gcatttacca
gtgaccatat
tgaaacgctg
tatgagctgg
acatcgagta
ctctcaagtt
1201
ttagccaagg
agtgtggagt
tgaaaacatc
agaagagctg
agtctcttaa
tggaaatcca
1261
ttgttctcta
aggccctggc
cgacttggtg
cattcacaca
tccagtcaaa
cgagctgtgt
1321
tccaagcagc
tgaccctgag
ctgtccgctc
tgtgtcaatc
ctgtctgcag
ggagactaaa
1381
tccttcttca
ccagccagca
gctgtgaccc
ccgccggtgg
accccgtggc
gttaggcaaa
1441
tgcccaacct
ccagatacct
ccgatgtgga
gagggtgtta
tttagagatc
aaggaaggaa
1501
gtcatccttc
cttgatatat
atacagcctt
tgggtacaaa
ttgtgtggtt
tcttgaggat
1561
tggactcttg
atggatttct
atttttatat
aactatacag
taagcatttg
tattttctct








http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/189181657





This is the map of restriction enzymes provided by NEBcutter. Unfortunately the only forward restriction enzyme usable was AvaI and it was not listed in any of the vectors in New England BioLabs collection and the use of the primers from Primer Blast will be used and a restriction enzyme will be attached.





































The vector I will be using is pCLIPf. It is listed on the web site and should work with my project.  The plasmid has two multiple cloning sites MCS1 and MCS2.  A group of fairly common restriction enzymes are in the MCS1 location.  Primer ECorRV looks to ba a good choice for the forward promer and EcoRI is a good choice for the reverse primer.

New England BioLabs desribes pCLIP as thus:

"pCLIPf Vector is a mammalian expression plasmid intended for the cloning and stable or transient expression of CLIP-tag® protein fusions in mammalian cells. This plasmid encodes CLIPf, a CLIP-tag protein, which is expressed under control of the CMV promoter. The expression vector has an IRES (internal ribosome entry site) and a neomycin resistance gene downstream of the CLIPf for the efficient selection of stable transfectants. pCLIPf Vector contains two multiple cloning sites to allow cloning of the fusion partner as a fusion to the N- or C-terminus of the CLIPf.

The CLIP-tag is a novel tool for protein research, allowing the specific, covalent attachment of virtually any molecule to a protein of interest. The CLIP-tag is a small polypeptide based on human O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase (hAGT). CLIP-tag substrates are derivatives of benzyl cytosine (BC). In the labeling reaction, the substituted benzyl group of the substrate is covalently attached to the reactive cysteine of CLIP-tag forming a stable thioether link."


















PCR primers EcoRV will be inserted on the forward strand and EcoRI will be inserted on the reverse strand.
Forward: GATATCCCACTGCTGGGCGGACACCT
Reverse: GAATTTTGCCTAACGCCACGGGGTC